Glgpu.extension=1Ĭlgpu.CLName="Intel(R) HD Graphics 530"Īpplication folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CC 2017\ Glgpu.GLDriver="C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_amd64_d5fc6475 20664d82\nvldumdx.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_amd64_d5fc6 47520664d82\nvldumdx.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_amd64_d5 fc647520664d82\nvldumdx.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_amd64 _d5fc647520664d82\nvldumdx.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_am d64_d5fc647520664d82\nvldumd.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.inf_ amd64_d5fc647520664d82\nvldumd.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami.in f_amd64_d5fc647520664d82\nvldumd.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvami. ![]() Glgpu.GLRenderer="GeForce GTX 960M/PCIe/SSE2" System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:3 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, HyperThreadingĭisplay Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920 I am currently mucking about with painting and this is when I noticed the poor performance.Īdobe Photoshop Version: 2017.1.0 20170309.r.207 9:23:00:00 CL 1107877 圆4 This is the worst performance I have experienced so far and have otherwise been extremely happy with the application. I am taking your advice and pasting my system info here. Very laggy, and even has even completely frozen a couple of times. (Which is yet another reason I don't want the subscription.) I don't do professional Photoshop work anymore. I'm largely just a casual user at this point. I don't typically want to convert ALL my RAW files, just selective ones. The DMC app looks like a 1990's batch converter from ImageReady. EXE where you can drag-n-drop the files you want to convert) rather than the ugly full directory version. At the minimum, I wish adobe would make a DMC DropLet (a single. ![]() And, I think it would be reasonable for the camera companies themselves to subsidize the maintenance of the plugin, or offer their own 3rd party plugins for Photoshop. I don't expect all features to be maintained, though the RAW Plugin is somewhat of a tradition. I feel guilty for every month I don't use them. I'm still not on board with subscription based creative services that require an online presence. I didn't mind a one time $999, $1399 or $2500 fee, and I'm still of the mind where I prefer to own software. I don't like the subscription based model of the CC products.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |